[ source ]
A question was asked, in response to my paper, Biblical Evidence For Apostolic Tradition (Including Oral Tradition) (related to the final section: "AUTHORITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE / SCRIPTURE IS NOT COMPLETELY SELF-INTERPRETING"):
Excellent question. Basically, first of all, the Catholic needs to learn good basic skills of Bible interpretation. I would recommend a book such as Making Senses Out of Scripture: Reading the Bible As the First Christians Did, by Mark Shea.How, then, is the Catholic to interpret Scripture, the basic rules of hermeneutics; exegesis, along with what the Church teaches? I'm still a bit in the dark on this.
Once that is understood, so elementary errors in exegesis and hermeneutics are not committed, a reader so informed is able to learn on his own, pretty much, from Scripture. But the Catholic always has a boundary, beyond which he cannot go: Catholic dogma. The Catholic exegete should always seek to conform his opinion with that of the Church. So it isn't so much that the Church is saying
A) "You can't interpret Scripture on your own"(as Protestant critics often caricature our approach) as it is saying, rather:
B) "don't become so independent that you interpret in a way that is contrary to Church dogma."Some Protestant critics think this stricture implies that Catholic exegetes aren't "free." But that is silly, since all Protestant traditions have doctrines, too, which are non-negotiable. A professor at a Calvinist seminary, for example, couldn't interpret Scripture in an Arminian, non-Calvinist fashion, or he would be out of a job. So every conscious Christian interpreter comes to the text with prior biases or beliefs, and believes that Scripture teaches those things. Why should Catholics be singled out? It's a double-standard argument.
For further related reading:
"Me, My Bible, and the Holy Spirit" (The Relationship of the Church to the Judgment of Individuals in the Matter of Authoritative Biblical Interpretation. Does the Church Require a Particular Meaning for Each Passage?)
25 Short Arguments on the Difficulties of Perspicuity (Clearness of Scripture for Salvation) and Private Judgment
Thoughts on Bibles and Catholics, Catholic "Sunday School," Catholic Bibles at Mass, Bible Memorization, Etc.
Luther Meets His Match: Part VI: Erasmus' Hyperaspistes (1526): Sola Scriptura & Perspicuity (Total Clarity) of Scripture Critiqued
Dialogue on the Clearness and Formal Sufficiency of Holy Scripture (Dave Armstrong vs. Carmen Bryant)
"Saint & Sinner's" Critique of The Catholic Verses, Part I: 1 Timothy 3:15 (Church Authority & Sola Scriptura) (+ Discussion)
Excerpts From Chapter One on Bible & Tradition From My Book, The Church Fathers Were Catholic (Including an Analysis of Perspicuity)