Thursday, September 27, 2007

Gerry Matatics Has Gone Completely (Theologically) Nuts

The image “http://files.aomin.org/images/jpeg/Matatics90.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

"I'm the Non-Catholic Your Catholic Parents Warned You About"


What a waste of zeal and brain power. Check out this amazing stuff:
. . . authentic Catholic Faith and that authentic Catholic Church are no longer found at the local parish, in the local diocese, or even ruling from Rome in our day.

[ . . . ]

Fact #9: John XXIII was not an orthodox Catholic, even before his election, but a modernist and a manifest heretic, a Freemason, and a promoter of Communism and Talmudic Judaism.

Fact #10: Paul VI was not an orthodox Catholic, even before his election, but a modernist and a manifest heretic, a Freemason, and a promoter of Communism and Talmudic Judaism (and possibly even a Jew himself).

Fact #11: John Paul I was not an orthodox Catholic, even before his election, but a modernist and a manifest heretic.

Fact #12: John Paul II was not an orthodox Catholic, even before his election, but a modernist and a manifest heretic, a Freemason, and a promoter of Communism and Talmudic Judaism (and possibly even a Jew himself).

Fact #13: Benedict XVI is not an orthodox Catholic, even before his election, but a modernist and a manifest heretic, and a promoter of Talmudic Judaism.

Again, I will provide abundant documentation in support of each of these claims in an expanded version of this essay to be posted in the near future.

Fact #14: This being so in the case of each of these men, another alarming but inescapable fact emerges from this: namely that, according to the constant teaching of the Catholic Church, these five men cannot be lawful successors to St. Peter, i.e. valid occupants of his papal throne.

[ . . . ]

Fact #16: This in turn means that, as unlawful usurpers of the papacy, John XXIII had no authority to call, and Paul VI no authority to consummate, a lawful and valid general council of the Church. The therefore illicit and invalid council John XXIII and Paul VI did call and conclude, respectively, would not and could not enjoy the protection and infallibility of the Holy Ghost.

Fact #17: . . . Vatican II's official promulgation of heresies -- something a true ecumenical council of the Church, even a "pastoral" one, is incapable of doing -- shows it to be but another "robber council" like 17 others previously condemned by the Church.

[ . . . ]

Fact #19: The Mass, the central Action of the Church on earth, has been illicitly subjected to radical revisions in the wake of Vatican II. These revisions are in many cases identical to, and in some cases even worse than, the revisions made by the Protestant Reformers, all of which revisions were condemned for all time by the Catholic Church. These revisions even include tampering with the form of the sacrament, the words which must be pronounced to make the sacrament take place. This change alone has rendered the New Mass invalid, making it the "abomination of desolation" predicted by the prophet Daniel and Our Lord. This can be proven from numerous documents of the Magisterium (teaching office) of the Church, as Patrick Henry Omlor and many other authors have ably shown.

1 comment:

Mary said...

This "amazing stuff" is only "nuts" if it can be proven to be untrue. Can even one of these points be shown to be in error?